Skip to content

Menu

Latham.London

Insights and opinions on the latest legal, regulatory and market developments impacting international business

HomeAbout UsTopicsSubscribe
Latham & Watkins logo
HomeAbout UsTopics
Subscribe
Search
Close

Latham.London

Insights and opinions on the latest legal, regulatory and market developments impacting international business

environmental social governance

Subscribe to environmental social governance via RSS

Sustainable Finance and Climate Change Risk in Financial Services

Posted on February 10, 2020
Posted in Environment, Finance and Capital Markets

Policy makers and regulators seem keen to adopt both a “carrot” and “stick” approach to channelling private finance sustainably.

Financial services regulators have been particularly vocal in the last 12 months, specifically about the impact on the financial services sector as the world experiences, and attempts to respond to, climate change.

Mark Carney, outgoing governor of the Bank of England, highlighted how pressing an issue climate change is for the sector in October 2019, stating that, “ … changes in…

Companies Must Carefully Consider ESG Disclosures Under UK Non-Financial Reporting Directive

Posted on March 13, 2018
Posted in Environment

Companies should conduct thorough due diligence in light of closer scrutiny from stakeholders and governmental and non-governmental bodies.

By James Inness and Natasha Hamilton-Foyn

Companies are facing increasing pressure to report on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters in terms of their legal obligations, stakeholder pressure, and reputational issues. Companies are subject to both mandatory and non-mandatory non-financial reporting obligations. For the first time, in 2018, under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), certain companies must publish in their annual reports information relating to environmental, social, and employee matters, respect for human rights, and anti-corruption and bribery matters. The NFRD therefore bolsters existing mandatory disclosure obligations under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and the Climate Change Act 2008. The forthcoming Conflicts Minerals Regulation will further strengthen these obligations.

China Prioritises Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Overseas Investment

Posted on November 2, 2017
Posted in Environment

By Paul Davies, Bridget Reineking, and Andrew Westgate

The Chinese government has announced a US$4 trillion investment in developing infrastructure globally under the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI). Under the BRI the Chinese government will spend US$750 billion on overseas investments in the next five years alone. Although China often cites the BRI as the country’s way of fostering sustainable economic development, there are concerns regarding management of environmental risks, especially in countries lacking environmental governance. In response, the Chinese government has recently issued two publications encouraging sustainable investment practices overseas.

China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the People’s Bank of China have jointly issued an Opinion on further Guiding and Regulating Outbound Investment (the Guiding Opinions). The four bodies intend that the Guiding Opinions will endorse foreign investment in strategically important areas, and discourage or ban investments that conflict with China’s national interests.

Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 and the Public Trust Doctrine: What Can We Expect?

Posted on June 6, 2017
Posted in Environment

By Paul Davies and Michael Green

The public trust doctrine is the principle that certain natural and cultural assets are preserved for public use and that it is the government’s obligation to protect and regulate these, both now and for future generations. Although the doctrine is established in English common law, it is not regularly deployed by the English courts. However, a new piece of legislation, the Well-being of Future Generations (Wales) Act 2015 (WFA), geared towards improving the social, economic, environmental and cultural wellbeing of Wales, captures many of the values of the public trust doctrine. In particular, it focuses on the long term impact of public body decisions and how they should promote a good quality of life for both current and future generations.

The public trust doctrine was established in English common law when a form of it reappeared in the 12th century, along with the onset of a more centralised legal system. One of the earliest cases is that of Juliana the Washerwoman (1299), in relation to a washerwoman who successfully challenged her powerful neighbour from cutting off her use of the watercourse. It was held that water had always been available for use by all, and that it was unlawful to pollute it. However, over time, the UK courts restricted the application of the public trust doctrine and it is now considered to do no more than give rise to a rebuttable presumption that the public has a right to fish, navigate and access the sea and tidal waterways. To date, these presumptions have not caused the state to actively take steps to protect public rights. However, many of the provisions of the WFA in fact impose positive obligations on public bodies so this arguably an effective implementation of the doctrine.

Sustainable Loans – Breaking the Mould for Sustainable Investment

Posted on May 30, 2017
Posted in Environment

By Paul Davies and Aaron Franklin

Royal Philips, a health technology company, has recently agreed to an innovative revolving credit facility agreement with a margin linked to the company’s year-on-year sustainability performance improvement. The agreement was entered into by a consortium of 16 international banks (led by ING, as Sustainability Coordinator) and provides for a commitment of €1 billion. Royal Philips’ current sustainability performance was benchmarked by the environmental, social and governance rating agency Sustainalytics: if the sustainability rating increases, the interest rate decreases and vice versa.

ING has monitored the sustainability performance of the companies it lends to since 2015. However, this is, to our knowledge, the first example of a credit facility structured so that sustainability performance is rewarded automatically. ING has flagged that this is a way to “support, motivate and reward” their clients “in their aim to become even more sustainable” and that it represents a “mind shift in corporate financing”.

Key Decision on Corporate Separateness – English High Court Decides Not to “impose liability in an indeterminate amount, for an indeterminate time, to an indeterminate class”

Posted on January 26, 2017
Posted in Dispute Resolution

By Paul Davies and Michael Green

In a highly anticipated judgment, the English High Court has ruled that Royal Dutch Shell (RDS), a holding company that is the ultimate parent of the Shell Group, does not owe a duty of care to residents of the Niger Delta in respect of alleged environmental damage said to have been caused by the operations of one of its Nigerian subsidiaries.

The decision is significant because it deals more generally with the issue of corporate separateness in large multinational groups, particularly in the context of corporate social responsibility, and allows for a greater understanding of the circumstances in which a parent company might attract civil responsibility for the acts and omissions of a subsidiary.

Increased awareness and public scrutiny over group structures and the corporate integrity of groups, means companies and investors alike (including private equity investors), should pay close attention to the outcome of this judgment and its potential implications.

Latham & Watkins logo
Facebook Twitter RSS LinkedIn Instagram YouTube

Austin, Beijing, Boston, Brussels, Chicago, Dubai, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Los Angeles – Downtown, Los Angeles – GSO, Madrid, Manchester – GSO, Milan, Munich, New York, Orange County, Paris, Riyadh, San Diego, San Francisco, Seoul, Silicon Valley, Singapore, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C.

Portions of this blog may constitute attorney advertising. Any testimonial or endorsement on this profile does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation.

Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in France, Hong Kong, Italy, Singapore, and the United Kingdom and as an affiliated partnership conducting the practice in Japan. Latham & Watkins operates in Israel through a limited liability company, in South Korea as a Foreign Legal Consultant Office, and in Saudi Arabia through a limited liability company.

Topics

Archives

© 2026, Latham & Watkins
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo