Skip to content

Menu

Latham.London

Insights and opinions on the latest legal, regulatory and market developments impacting international business

HomeAbout UsTopicsSubscribe
Latham & Watkins logo
HomeAbout UsTopics
Subscribe
Search
Close

Latham.London

Insights and opinions on the latest legal, regulatory and market developments impacting international business

Home » Posts » China Prioritises Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Overseas Investment

China Prioritises Environmental, Social, and Governance Factors in Overseas Investment

Posted on November 2, 2017
Posted in Environment

By Paul Davies, Bridget Reineking, and Andrew Westgate

The Chinese government has announced a US$4 trillion investment in developing infrastructure globally under the “Belt and Road Initiative” (BRI). Under the BRI the Chinese government will spend US$750 billion on overseas investments in the next five years alone. Although China often cites the BRI as the country’s way of fostering sustainable economic development, there are concerns regarding management of environmental risks, especially in countries lacking environmental governance. In response, the Chinese government has recently issued two publications encouraging sustainable investment practices overseas.

China’s National Development and Reform Commission, Ministry of Commerce, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the People’s Bank of China have jointly issued an Opinion on further Guiding and Regulating Outbound Investment (the Guiding Opinions). The four bodies intend that the Guiding Opinions will endorse foreign investment in strategically important areas, and discourage or ban investments that conflict with China’s national interests.

The Guiding Opinions classify overseas investments within one of three categories: “encouraged,” “restricted,” or “prohibited.” Transactions that fail to meet the host nation’s environmental, energy-efficiency, or safety standards fall within the restricted category. The four bodies will scrutinise these investments more closely, and may impose conditions on certain transactions. The level of a transaction’s non-compliance with environmental or energy-efficiency standards that will result in a restricted category classification remains unclear. However, China’s inclusion of host-country regulations in the Guiding Opinions indicates that China is pushing for stronger environmental standards beyond its own borders.

Following the International Green Finance Seminar in September 2017, the participating parties, including the Ministry of Environmental Protection’s Foreign Economic Cooperation Office, released the Environmental Risk Management Initiative for China’s Overseas Investment. This publication consists of 12 articles which set out the relevant principles, such as disclosure of environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information, and encourages investors to consider (ESG) factors in investment decision making.

The Chinese government is reportedly drafting legally binding regulations on overseas investment, including plans to implement the Environmental Risk Management Initiative’s 12 articles to form a detailed operational guide before the end of 2017.

Clearly, Chinese investors will need to consider ESG standards in evaluating outbound investment opportunities, as China seeks to deliver on its promise of sustainable economic development both inside and outside the country.

 

Read more on the development of China’s environmental policy:

President Xi Jinping Pledges Sustainable Development to Build a “Beautiful China”

Proposed Draft Legislation Clamps Down on Soil Pollution in China

Will Tougher Environmental Laws Mean Measurable Change for Pollution in China?

U.S. Withdrawal from Paris Agreement Creates an Opening for China to Lead

China One of First Countries to Sign Paris Agreement

This post was prepared with the assistance of Tegan Creedy in the London office of Latham & Watkins.

Tags: china, environment, environmental social governance, ESG, sustainable investment
Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Related Posts
portion of trees against office buildings
UK Government Announces New Import Carbon Pricing Mechanism
December 19, 2023
Green Leaf - defocused background
UK House of Lords Considers New Bill on Mandatory Human Rights and Environmental Due Diligence
December 14, 2023
Stock-Images-Places-United-Kingdom-UK-London-Houses-of-Parliament
UK Announces Updates to Green Finance Strategy
April 27, 2023
Subscribe to Latham.London
Subscribe
Latham & Watkins logo
Facebook Twitter RSS LinkedIn Instagram YouTube

Austin, Beijing, Boston, Brussels, Chicago, Dubai, Düsseldorf, Frankfurt, Hamburg, Hong Kong, Houston, London, Los Angeles, Los Angeles – Downtown, Los Angeles – GSO, Madrid, Manchester – GSO, Milan, Munich, New York, Orange County, Paris, Riyadh, San Diego, San Francisco, Seoul, Silicon Valley, Singapore, Tel Aviv, Tokyo, and Washington, D.C.

Portions of this blog may constitute attorney advertising. Any testimonial or endorsement on this profile does not constitute a guarantee, warranty, or prediction regarding the outcome of your legal matter. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Results depend upon a variety of factors unique to each representation.

Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in France, Hong Kong, Italy, Singapore, and the United Kingdom and as an affiliated partnership conducting the practice in Japan. Latham & Watkins operates in Israel through a limited liability company, in South Korea as a Foreign Legal Consultant Office, and in Saudi Arabia through a limited liability company.

Topics

Archives

© 2025, Latham & Watkins
Law blog design & platform by LexBlog LexBlog Logo