Companies and investors must consider the impact that poor corporate culture may have on their potential to achieve an exit, in particular an IPO.
By David Berman, Richard Butterwick, Chris Horton, Robbie McLaren, Anna Ngo, Nell Perks, Catherine Campbell, and Charlotte Collins
It is now apparent that no institution or business unit, whatever its geography, industry, sector, or size, is above the negative impact of a poor culture. Culture- related issues at Uber, Sports Direct, Boeing, and others highlight the implications of getting things wrong, including financial loss, reputational issues, and damage to investor confidence.
Often defined as “the way that people within an organisation behave when no one is looking”, culture is a growing area of focus for regulators and policymakers around the world. The focus on culture has become more acute during the COVID-19 pandemic, as investors and consumers observe and judge companies based on their navigation of the crisis, particularly treatment of employees and wider societal stakeholders.
Companies are facing increasing pressure to report on environmental, social, and governance (ESG) matters in terms of their legal obligations, stakeholder pressure, and reputational issues. Companies are subject to both mandatory and non-mandatory non-financial reporting obligations. For the first time, in 2018, under the Non-Financial Reporting Directive (NFRD), certain companies must publish in their annual reports information relating to environmental, social, and employee matters, respect for human rights, and anti-corruption and bribery matters. The NFRD therefore bolsters existing mandatory disclosure obligations under the Modern Slavery Act 2015 and the Climate Change Act 2008. The forthcoming Conflicts Minerals Regulation will further strengthen these obligations.